Innovative leadership models in Orchestras: What I learned at Classical:NEXT

Headshot of Boran Zaza

By Boran Zaza, Director of Communications & Development at Orchestras Canada.


Classical:NEXT (C:N) is the largest global gathering of art music professionals. Traditionally, it has taken place in different European cities each year — as of 2024, C:N has made Berlin, Germany its permanent home. C:N features conference sessions, showcases, meetups and project pitches. Over 1400 art music professionals from 49 countries attended this edition – their biggest gathering yet, after a hiatus in 2023 to consider “what’s next?” 

From May 13 to 17, I had the privilege of attending C:N for the first time, thanks to generous funding from the Canada Council for the Arts through the Supporting Artistic Practice: Professional Development for Arts Professionals
program. As someone in the “conference organizing” business, I must say that I was quite impressed by the magnitude of this event, the variety of sessions offered, and the plethora of experiences present at the same space! There is something for everyone at C:N. My main interests were conference sessions focusing on the future of orchestras, of which there were many. Three key orchestra-specific themes emerged from the sessions that I attended:  

  1. Leadership models in orchestras  
  2. Environmental sustainability  
  3. New audiences: How to retain them?  

The topic of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging was also present, especially at the global orchestras meetup that I attended. Feminism in classical music was another topic of discussion and interest, about which I attended a fascinating session.  

In this first blog post, I will focus on the first theme: Leadership models in orchestras.  

No Conductor, No Chairs, No Sheet Music 

On the opening day of the C:N in Berlin’s newest concert hall, Saal Pierre Boulez (opened in 2017), five showcases took place. The one that stuck with me the most was Stegreif, the Improvising Symphony Orchestra from Germany. Stegreif is a collective of 30 musicians, who “combine the heritage of classical compositions with improvisation and regard the classical symphony as the starting point for a new concert experience”. Stegreif’s showcase was called “The Symphony of Change”, was based on the works of 4 female composers:  Hildegard von Bingen (1098-1179), Wilhelmine von Bayreuth (1709-1785), Emilie Mayer (1812-1883) and Clara Schumann (1819-1896). Stegreif started by performing each piece as originally composed, then the original transcription diverged and opened space for improvisation, complemented with choreography.  

Credit: Classical:NEXT, #Cnext24
Photo: twinematics

Their performance was immersive: in the oval concert hall, musicians walked around barefoot between the audiences, all leading and following one another without a conductor. Their energy was contagious… it felt like a big classical music party among friends! Even the cellos had stools with wheels that allowed them to move around. This reminded me of the Montreal-based ensemble Collectif9, which also performs standing up with neither sheet music nor a conductor. Stegreif has taken that concept of having no conductor and the musical freedom while playing to a whole different level to create a truly immersive experience, and their ensemble is made up of about 2/3 classical musicians and 1/3 jazz musicians – I had never seen anything like this before!  

The next day, still buzzing from this unique musical experience, I attended a conference session titled Leading and Following in the Orchestra: Models Beyond the Traditional Hierarchy, presented by Stegreif. The three speakers were the Artistic Director, Lorenz Blaumer, the Managing Director, Lorina Strange, and their Jazz Drummer and composer, Hiromu Seifert. In this session, Stegreif spoke in detail about their philosophy, how they work together, their artistic mediation and community outreach efforts, governance, and pay equity, among other topics.  

Here are my top learnings from this presentation:  

Photo: Boran Zaza

1. Collective leadership happens on-stage, and most importantly, off-stage
The end result that we see on stage when attending a performance by Stegreif is impressive, with musicians leading and following one another on stage seamlessly. Achieving this result requires the involvement of all musicians in decision-making, artistic and otherwise, on and off stage. All the musicians participate in shaping the performance, and rehearsals are led by different people (even for the same work). The musicians also participate in “Future Days,” where they share (and sometimes argue) about their values and artistic goals.  

2. Inward mediation is as essential as the outward mediation
You probably know about artistic mediation and community outreach. But what is integrated mediation?  

Integrated mediation is the interplay of collective management culture, artistic work, and mediation. It has 2 components:  

  • Outward mediation, which is one the many orchestras across Canada already do through programs presented at schools, community centers, retirement homes, hospitals and more.  
  • Inward mediation, which means learning from each other within the orchestra. For this, each musician takes a leadership role in educating their colleagues through a workshop or a seminar on a topic relevant to the orchestra.  

The outcome of both different mediations helps inform artistic decisions of the ensemble.  


3. Pay equality doesn’t equal pay equity, but it’s a good starting point
At Stegreif, all musicians are paid equally. This worked well for a while, but as some orchestra members had children, “equal” pay didn’t respond to disparities in living situations. For example, when the orchestra goes on tour, who pays for childcare for those who require it? Everything can be discussed at Stegreif. So now, on tour, the orchestra pays for the accommodation and flight of a babysitter but not the babysitter fees. They encourage the musicians to bring a family member to take care of the kids.  

For staff salaries, the board of directors (comprised of 5 musicians) decides how much the staff is paid.  

4. Collective leadership is not about one leadership style: It’s about knowing when to use which leadership style
Every musician of Stegreif knows exactly what the 5 leadership models are: Democratic, participative, autocratic, charismatic, and natural (competence-based). By educating all musicians on these leadership models, they understand exactly what strategies are employed when, why they are used, and how to be better followers when a certain leadership style is in use. For example: the musicians are co-creating a new work in a democratic style but conversations take longer than expected, the show is the next day, and executive decisions must be made quickly – the musicians know exactly how to react to this and how to help one another, whether leading or following, to ensure the show is ready on time.  

5. The magic ingredient: Having fun together!
The Stegreif team radiates a unique pride in their pertinence, belonging and making a difference for each musician in this orchestra. The trust that has been built over the years among the musicians and their sense of ownership of their orchestra makes it more than a job: it is family and friends. Oftentimes after rehearsal, the musicians will stay to jam together and have fun. One of the topics that came up throughout C:N was how to keep orchestra musicians engaged and inspired throughout their career, and Stegreif is certainly on to something through their leadership model!  

You can learn more about Stegreif on their website.

You can see videos of what a Stegreif concert experience is like here

And What if Orchestras were Owned by Musicians?  

Photo: Boran Zaza

The other conference session that focused heavily on leadership models was titled A Vision for the Symphony Orchestra: Transformative Leadership and Collective Innovation in Orchestral Music. Panelists included Simon Webb, Head of Orchestras and Choirs at BBC and Fiona Stevens, CEO of Concerto Köln. The panel was chaired by Karsten Witt, Managing Director of Karsten Witt Musik Management GmbH.  

In London, UK, the four main orchestras (Royal Philharmonic, London Symphony, London Philharmonic and Philharmonia) are owned and governed by the musicians. Simon Webb talked about how he, a seventh cellist, found himself in a leadership role as someone on the board without any prior leadership experience.  

Fiona Stevens used to be an extra at the Concerto Köln. She changed her career during the pandemic when the job of CEO at that orchestra opened.  She’s currently doing an MBA in Arts Innovation at the Global Leaders program to address the gaps in training that did not necessarily prepare her for a leadership position.  

Those are two instances of musicians finding themselves in leadership roles with many responsibilities without having formal training or preparation for handling them. Both examples here are thriving, but it took them a lot of courage, time, and hard work. This raises the question: How can we better prepare musicians for leadership roles for which their musical training did not prepare them?  

Some of the main discussion points of this panel included the following: 

  1. If musicians are involved in leadership, they should have access to the training and resources needed to be good leaders. Leadership training is not part of musical training, despite the fact that musicians are likely to find themselves in a leadership role, one way or another, at some point in their careers.  
  2. What are musicians in orchestras and ensembles learning from their organizations, and what are their organizations learning from them? Orchestras have long prized compliance and efficiency in the rehearsal and delivery of concerts for the public. But what if we prioritized experimentation and learning – by musicians, by staff, by volunteers – instead?    
  3. Orchestras should open up to communities and stay relevant to them. How do orchestras develop talent within the community? Every orchestra and choir must support learning by the people they serve, so they can participate more deeply in the art form.  How orchestras partner with universities, nurseries, and schools is very important to how they stay relevant in their communities.  

Additional Reading Resources:

In my next blog post, I will cover environmental sustainability in orchestras. In the meantime, to get a taste of the Classical:NEXT experience in video format, check out the Instagram stories I posted while in Berlin!  

A beer brewery turned into a cultural hub in Berlin. Photo: Boran Zaza

 

We acknowledge the support of the Canada Council for the Arts.

Logo, Canada Council for the Arts logo

10 Insights: What do Performing Arts Audiences Want Now?

On June 22nd, Orchestras Canada, in partnership with CAPACOA and the Association for Opera in Canada, presented a free webinar on the latest trends and research on ticket-buying behavior of performing arts patrons. Eric Nelson from TRG Arts presented research on the recovery of the performing arts post pandemic, and Zander Kyba from AudienceView presented and analyzed ticket buyer research collected by their team.  

We’ve put together 10 insights we learned from their presentation that will help orchestras boost their bottom line, five from Eric & TRG Arts and five from Zander & AudienceView.  

 

10 Insights: What do Performing Arts Audiences Want Now?  

 

Insights from Eric and TRG Arts 

1.We need to compete with the couch

Eric shared that in order to compete with the comfort of home, organizations should lean into the intrinsic value of gathering together and the elevated experience. Audiences are looking for experiences that are immersive, gamified, diverse and/or with technology everywhere 

2. Donations are decreasing 

When we compare quarter 4 of 2022 and quarter 1 of 2023 to the same quarters in 2019, some very interesting insights into revenue recovery post pandemic are revealed. To begin with, we can see that revenue is down 5%, but units are only down 17%. This indicates that, while attendance is down to events, those who do attend are spending more than they did pre-pandemic. Donation revenue tells a different story. Donations are down 38% in revenue and 24% in units, meaning that there are fewer people donating and those who do are donating less than before. To address this, Eric recommends speaking to donors and investigating what is holding them back from donating at the same level as before. Later we will explore other strategies to bring back donors.  

3. Take a closer look at patron loyalty

What is RFMG? TRG Arts offers this anagram to analyze the commitment and loyalty of patrons:  

  • Recency: Are they engaging in some way every year? 
  • Frequency: Do they engage frequently during the same season? 
  • Monetary: How does their financial investment compare? 
  • Growth: Can we count on their investment/activity to be consistent (or grow) every season? 

These are the metrics we should be assessing when looking at loyalty programs and targeted marketing. 

4. New Customers are coming, but they aren’t staying!

TRG Arts divides patrons into segments that cover the wide spectrum of loyalty within an organization’s database. They describe 3 levels of engagement and further segments them below; acquisition, current customer, and re-engaged: 

Acquisition 

  • New Customer: Had not transacted previously. 

Current Customer 

  • Once before: Transacted once before within the past 18 months. 
  • Convertee: Transacted twice before and at least once within the past 18 months. 
  • Active: Transacted 3-9 times in their history and at least once in the past 18 months  
  • Super Active: Transacted 10+ times in their history and at least once in the past 18 months  

Re-Engaged  

  • Stale: last attendance, prior to the most recent purchase, was 18-36 months ago  
  • Lapsed: last attendance, prior to the most recent purchase, was 3 years or more ago

From these segments, TRG Arts has collected data that shows significant participation from New Customers but that loses momentum from Once Before and Convertee patrons. This tells us that the churn rate of consumers is higher than ever before and that organizations need to be taking extra measures to drive retention from new patrons.  

5. Gen X and Millennials are participating more! 

Finally, Eric presented data divided by generations and taken exclusively from orchestras within the dataset. TRG Arts found that Gen X and Millennial participation has grown post pandemic while older generation participation has declined. Yet, Baby Boomers are still the largest donors within the data set. Millennial contributions have grown but Gen X has remained stagnant. Eric pointed out that Gen X patrons should be nearing the peak of their earning potential and thus should be larger philanthropists. He recommends organizations reach out to this demographic and make a targeted effort to engage them.  

 

Insights from Zander and AudienceView 

6. 41% of patrons are attending fewer events than they did pre-pandemic 

Zander began his section of the webinar by revealing that, according to AudienceView’s data, most patrons are attending the same or more performances than they did pre-pandemic. Yet, there remains 41% of patrons who are attending fewer events than they did in 2019. So how do we get these folks back?  

AudienceView’s data revealed that 63% of patrons said that ticket sales and discounts would compel them to attend more events followed by new shows and content being brought to the venue. The 3rd most popular option was subscriptions and packages with flexibility and value.  

7. Patrons are looking for elevated experiences 

AudienceViews data also revealed that audiences are looking for full and elevated experiences when they attend events, with 4 of 5 reporting that they prefer to pair event attendance with another experience. Patrons are looking to make a full afternoon or evening of their event experience by pairing a meal or drink with their experience. Zander suggests that organizations appeal to this by partnering with food and drink venues to offer packages or reservations along with ticket purchases.

8. Box office and phone purchasing are on the rise 

AudienceView reports that while most patrons this year continue to prefer to buy tickets online, 20% of patrons reported that they preferred to make purchases using the box office in person or via phone call. This is of interest as last year’s data showed that only 13% of patrons preferred in person or phone call purchases, showing a significant increase.  

Additionally, Zander pointed out that when asked why they abandoned purchases, 39% of patrons reported that they found that added online fees were unexpected and too high. For this reason, he suggested that organizations should notify patrons from the beginning of the purchase journey that these fees exist or working them into ticket prices, so they seem less shocking to consumers.  

9. Make donation opportunities available along the patron journey  

AudienceView’s data suggests that patrons are welcome to donate during multiple stages of their purchase journey. Patrons reported a smattering of responses when asked. The top two answers were online separate from the ticket buying process, and in person at the event separate from the ticket buying process. This is followed by online during the ticket buying process. What this suggests is that organizations should be providing opportunities to donate in multiple locations across the patron journey to address all preferences. 

10. Patrons want exclusivity in exchange for their donations 

So, how do we persuade patrons to donate when we ask them? AudienceView’s data suggests a few strategies, most of which provide a sense of exclusivity. Top examples include early access to purchase event tickets, tax deductions and access to exclusive donor only events. The data also shows that patrons are most likely to donate to public fundraisers hosted by venues and associations that share specific goals. People want to know where their money is going, so Zander recommends making that clear in fundraising communications. 

 

We would like to offer a final thank you to Eric and Zander for sharing their insight and expertise on this topic! Additionally, thank you to our co-presenters CAPACOA and the Association for Opera in Canada. If you would like to learn more about what Eric and Zander shared or review the recording and slide deck from their presentations, check out https://oc.ca/en/resource/performing-arts-recovery/.  

Reflections on SphinxConnect: Forging Alliances

From January 27-29, 2022 the Orchestras Canada team had the pleasure of attending the SphinxConnect: Forging Alliances conference. The annual convening, held virtually this year, brought together a stellar lineup of presenters across the North American arts ecosystem (musicians, administrators, board members, funders, and more) to discuss diversity in classical music – including fellow Canadian and Orchestras Canada’s own board member, Daniel Bartholomew-Poyser. The conference culminated in the annual Sphinx Competition for young Black and Latinx string players – another virtual adaptation for this year, but with no loss of talent and creativity.

In the blog post below, OC staff share a few of our reflections on themes that emerged – however, we encourage you to learn from the thoughtful presenters directly as you are able. The recordings of the conference presentations are all generously made available for free in a playlist on the Sphinx Organization’s YouTube channel! 

About the Sphinx Organization 

The Sphinx Organization is a US-based “social justice organization dedicated to transforming lives through the power of diversity in the arts,” founded by American violinist and music educator Aaron Dworkin. It began its work in 1997 as the Sphinx Competition for young Black and Latinx string players. The competition continues to this day, but Sphinx has since evolved a robust suite of programming focused on fostering excellence and increasing representation of Black and Latinx classical artists – including education, performance, commissioning of new works, and leadership development opportunities for Black and Latinx artists and arts workers. 

Conference reflections 

1- Human potential and innovation 

A theme that arose repeatedly in the sessions that OC staff attended is the human potential and innovation that is possible for orchestras, if we are willing to embrace its full spectrum. The conference program covered so many areas of opportunity for orchestras – from governance, to artistic programming, to music education and community engagement and beyond. There is so much talent – both in emerging artists and arts workers, as well as existing expertise in folks already working in the art form – that we can engage with and learn from.  

As Achia Floyd put it in the “Rising LEADers” session: don’t think within a frame of what we are losing by diversifying classical music, but instead what we are gaining… the opportunities for developing the talent and art form you already have in your organization, and how we can grow through better, more innovative and inclusive collaboration. 

2- An ongoing tension for orchestras: Upholding tradition vs. Responding to today’s realities 

A quote that stands out in particular to OC staff is “Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but maintaining the fire,” shared by Enrique Márquez in the Rising LEADers session. WOW! How can (and will) orchestras’ art, our capacity to gather people to enjoy music together, serve our neighbours in 2022 and beyond?  

For the last couple of centuries, orchestras have been (by and large) in the business of tradition – particularly Eurocentric tradition, at the expense of racialized artists, workers, and patrons. While there is much beauty in the music we have played through centuries, presenters across SphinxConnect sessions rightly point out that the continued survival and elevation of classical music in the 21st century depends on a keener attention to the needs and ambitions of the communities in which we presently live – especially those that our Eurocentric traditions have excluded.  

Not only is drawing from a broader palette of talent (in the work played, in those playing it, and in those “keeping the lights on” behind the scenes) the right thing to do from an anti-racist + being good humans and art-makers point of view, it enriches an orchestra’s work and is essential to the perception of our continued relevance and value. For example, one panelist pointed out that millennials expect diversity when they enter arts spaces – if your orchestra is not reflecting the communities you serve, you risk being passed over by your audiences of present and future. 

Jazmín Morales, host of the “Where the Wild Things Are” panel, emphasized that to be “wild” and thus responsive to the “wild times” in which we live means to think freely about what is possible and not get stuck in procedure and habit. And as the “Higher Registers: Evolving Artistic Excellence” panel pointed out, the pandemic has broken many habits (e.g. rigid artistic planning cycles, length of concerts) — how can we continue to evolve with and respond to our turbulent times? 

3- Sustaining and continuing to build on positive change 

In his closing keynote, Weston Sprott stated that he had seen more progress on diversity and inclusion in classical music in the last two years than he had seen prior to that in his entire lifetime – however, “the jury is still out” on how long the work lasts… as such, “It’s on us to keep the pressure to ensure that all this progress is not temporary”. 

Presenters also emphasized that lasting change in the diversity of our art forms is key – and part of ensuring lasting change is (as David Stull put it) by “altering the DNA” of arts institutions, structurally inserting and creating mechanisms that require change to continue, such as multi-year ongoing programs that commit to diverse artists’ advancement over the long term – not just the present moment.  

Multiple conference presenters advocated for a broad scope for diversity work in each organization: it cannot be siloed on one committee or in one role. Presenters emphasized the importance of aligning values at all levels of decision-making (including board, executive leadership, and funders) – but also noted that change can happen in any team or role. For example, in “Learning to Disrupt ‘the White Racial Frame’ in an Industry Rooted In It” marketing and communications staff reflected on how they had applied anti-racism in their daily work at Minnesota Orchestra, sharing examples of racist vs. anti-racist language. 

4- Last but never least… the music! A chat with 2022 Sphinx Competition judge, Juan-Miguel Hernandez 

Headshot of Juan-Miguel HernandezJuan-Miguel Hernandez, a Montréal-born violist with a distinguished international performance career, is no stranger to the Sphinx Competition. In a mid-February phone conversation with Boran Zaza (OC Communications and Development Director) Hernandez credited his top prize in the Senior Division at the 2006 Sphinx Competition as an important “kickstart” for his success as a classical musician:  

“I had it in me, but I needed them to say, okay, we’ll give you what you need to kickstart the career. […] It’s the whole being in the right place at the right time. Sphinx makes sure you’re in the right place at the right time.” 

When discussing the 2022 competition, for which Hernandez was one of several judges, he emphasized that each young performer arrives with outstanding technical skills – to decide on the top prizes, Hernandez boils judges’ expectations “down to an incredible artistry in a way of doing music. […] And we were incredibly impressed with the level of artistry that we saw.” Given the virtual format of the 2022 competition, judges cast their votes individually after the performances to decide on competition winners (as opposed to gathering in person to reach a decision). Despite the change in format, for Hernandez “this year I have to say I was very, very happy with the end result.” 

Congratulations to the 2022 Sphinx Competition Winners! 

Senior Division 

  • First Place Laureate & winner of the Robert Frederick Smith Prize ($50,000): Kebra-Seyoun Charles, double bass 
  • Second Place ($20,000) : Gabriela Lara, violin 
  • Third Place ($10,000): Harper Randolph, viola 
  • Audience Choice ($5,000): Gabriela Lara, violin 

Junior Division  

  • First Place Laureate ($10,000): Jonathan Okseniuk, violin 
  • Second Place ($5,000) : Brandon Leonard, cello 
  • Third Place ($3,000): Ana Isabella España, violin 
  • Audience Choice ($1,000): Brandon Leonard, cello 

Links to resources 

The full recording of the 2022 Sphinx Competition can be viewed here. 

Recordings of all SphinxConnect conference sessions: YouTube

Notes on conference sessions attended by OC staff here.

Resources from A Spotlight on Women in Musical Leadership

On Wednesday, October 27, 2021, Orchestras Canada and the Association for Opera in Canada partnered to present a spotlight on the Women in Musical Leadership (WML) program, a multi-year training fellowship for female and non-binary conductors.

Helmed by Tapestry Opera and lead partners Toronto Symphony Orchestra and Pacific Opera Victoria, WML addresses the historic gender inequity at the classical podium by providing intensive training, mentorship, and opportunities to gifted conductors. Working in tandem with a growing network of partner organizations across Canada, WML facilitates placements where participants observe and engage in the activities of partner seasons.

Watch the recording of the session
Download the information document of the WML program

If you have any questions about how to get involved or want to learn more about WML, please get in touch with Jennifer Szeto, Women in Leadership Project Manager: jszeto@tapestryopera.com

Storytelling’s Superpower: Artistic Responses to the Climate Crisis

On June 2nd, Soulpepper Theatre Company, Professional Association of Canadian Theatres (PACT), and Artists for Real Climate Action (ARCA) hosted “The Green Sessions: A Day of Learning”. OC staff attended and were blown away! As we explore and contextualize the implications of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals for Canadian orchestras under OC’s 2021-2024 strategic framework, this afternoon of learning offered insights into a key question: What could our artistic responses to the climate crisis accomplish?  

The Green Sessions: A Day of Learning comprised plenary sessions with renowned speakers as well as anumber of breakout sessions to explore specific aspects of the climate emergency in detail. Presenters included Melina Laboucan-Massimo, the Hon. Steven Guilbeault, Jesse Wente, Seth Klein, Annamie Paul, Dale Marshall, Kendra Falconi, David Maggs, Carolynne Crawley, Alanna Mitchell, Toby Heaps, Matt Millares, Gabrielle Bastien, Batul Gulamhusein and Emma Stenning. 

Below, you’ll find a few key takeaways: 

Indigenous Worldviews at the Forefront 

The day began with a heartfelt presentation from Melina Laboucan-Massimo (founder of Sacred Earth Solar and co-founder of Indigenous Climate Action). Melina’s home community is Lubicon Lake Cree First Nation in Little Buffalo, Alberta – situated in the heart of the Boreal Forest and the Alberta oil sands. Melina emphasized the power of Indigenous worldviews to address the climate crisis by valuing reciprocity with mother Earth as well as collective care structures and governance. Melina also reflected on the impact of intergenerational trauma on First Nations people brought on by environmental racism (such as an oil spill in Melina’s home community), residential schools, and centuries of colonialism. For Indigenous peoples in Canada, cultural and environmental genocide are connected, as continued destruction of the land or removal of Indigenous peoples from their lands also contributes to the destruction of Indigenous ways of life. In our fight for climate justice, it is imperative to acknowledge the strength of Indigenous worldviews to inform paths forward as well as pain, exhaustion and trauma Indigenous communities face amidst settler colonialism. Orchestras Canada stands in solidarity with the First Nations, Inuit, and Métis people on the frontlines of the fight for environmental justice. 

Watch Melina’s keynote, “Indigenous Issues and the Climate Emergency,” here 

 

Storytelling’s Superpower: Inspiring Action and Change 

In his keynote, The Hon. Steven Guilbeault (Minister of Canadian Heritage) drew from his experience working in environmental activism prior to joining the House of Commons. He mused on the limitations of climate communication focusing on dreadful statistics or doom, expressing his belief in the connection between the arts and a new wave of more effective climate communication focused on instilling hope to inspire action. 

In his keynote, Jesse Wente (Chair of the Canada Council for the Arts) emphasized the power of art to “liberate our imaginations” to envision better futures than what capitalism and colonialism currently offer, socially and environmentally. Further, he argued that storytelling is “crisis resistant” — as artists, we have the power to reframe and raise the profile of the climate emergency, within and beyond our sector, starting any time. We can use art to communicate and vivify our current emergency and our futures; to mobilize communities and inspire new thinking about our present and future relationships with the Earth. For example, through partnerships with scientists and environmental organizations, The Only Animal uses theatre to foster a “love story” between audiences and the natural world.  

Watch Minister Guilbeault’s keynote, “The Climate Emergency and Politics,” here 

Watch Jesse’s keynote, “The Climate Emergency and Culture,” here  

Rallying Around The Emergency 

Author Seth Klein’s keynote presentation distilled the arguments from his recent book, A Good War: Mobilizing Canada for the Climate Emergency, connecting the lessons from large-scale mobilization around the Second World War to our present-day climate crisis. Every great mobilization needs the arts! For example, looking back to World War II, artists played a critical role in helping to sell war bonds, creating paintings of the front lines, and producing relevant music. It was an era when art and hope met to motivate people amidst an incredible challenge.  

Seth argues that prior to going into “emergency mode” to address a crisis, societies usually experience a denial period (you may be familiar with this challenge in the climate sense…). According to Seth, the four markers of when a government has upgraded its efforts to emergency mode are:  

  1. Spending whatever it takes to “win” 
  2. Creating new institutions to get it done 
  3. Turning voluntary/incentive-based policies into mandatory measures 
  4. Telling the truth to communicate the sense of emergency 

As of yet, no Canadian political party meets all four markers regarding the climate emergency. Take the COVID-19 pandemic for comparison; these 4 markers were hit very quickly in Canada! The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) estimates that the government spends $5 billion a year on the climate emergency, and $5 billion a week on the COVID-19 pandemic. We saw extraordinary spending to protect our population against the threat of COVID-19, which (Seth argues) demonstrates that these funds have always been available for emergencies — they just haven’t been allocated to issues like climate change. With the majority of Canadian leaders not acting as if climate change is an emergency, our greenhouse gas emission levels are not reducing at the rate needed to meet the crisis looming. Currently, all measures are voluntary and, thus, easy to ignore.  

Watch Seth’s keynote, “The Climate Emergency and the Artists,” here 

Artists Leading 

Personal contributions matter, but if we want significant changes, we need the government to act. As multiple speakers noted, we have 11 years to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions enough to avoid catastrophic climate change. Annamie Paul (Leader of the Green Party of Canada) reminded attendees that Canada ranks among the top five countries in the world for greenhouse gas emissions per capita, with the worst reduction records among the G7. Since signing the Paris agreement in 2016, our emissions have actually increased every year – not declined. If we want to reduce emissions by 60% by 2030, Annamie argues that we need carbon budgets and big changes. By and large, the public recognizes the scale of our emergency – but why don’t our political leaders? How can we motivate them, or increase the number of people in politics willing to act on the climate crisis? Annamie encouraged artists to run for politics, to take up seats at the table with our voices advocating for climate action and the vitality of our sector. 

Watch Annamie’s keynote, “Climate Action and Policy,” here 

The Green Sessions: A Day of Learning was inspiring and shed light on how artists and arts organizations can engage our skills to champion change together. Stay tuned to Soulpepper Theatre for news on upcoming Green Sessions: A Day of Training and A Day of Action which are scheduled for late August/early September (exact dates TBC). You can reach Soulpepper Theatre at greensessions@soulpepper.ca and can view all recordings from The Green Sessions in this YouTube playlist: The Green Sessions: Day of Learning recordings 

A Pandemic Snapshot of Orchestras

Visual for the SurveyTo mark one year since the pandemic halted the operations of orchestras and arts organizations across Canada, we are diving into some new data about the situation of orchestras. The National Arts and Culture Impact Survey, which was spearheaded by Orchestras Canada and the findings of which were published earlier this year, received responses from 728 organizations, including 73 orchestras. Comparing orchestras with arts organizations overall helps shed light on some key trends that can help orchestras orient themselves for the gradual relaunch ahead. 

1- Orchestras feel left behind by government supports

Overall, orchestras felt less positive about many of the government supports than arts organizations as a whole. 57% of orchestras said they were not eligible for the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS), compared to 45% of all arts organizations. Overall, orchestras were less likely to give a positive rating to most government support programs:

2- Orchestras are leading the work-from-home trend

Nearly three-quarters (72%) of orchestra workers have been working from home during the pandemic. Even after an eventual relaunch, 50% of the orchestral workforce is expected to continue working from home. This proportion doubles pre-pandemic levels (26%) and is higher than arts organizations as a whole (42%).

3-Orchestras are feeling positive about digital

Orchestras tended to have more positive experiences with digital programming than arts organizations as a whole, with 49% saying digital programming exceeded their expectations versus 35% of organizations as a whole. Interestingly, orchestras are more likely to agree that they have the interest, capacity, knowledge, equipment and technology, and internet speed to go digital than arts organizations as a whole.

4-Nearly one in three orchestras is at risk, others are in a holding pattern

31% of orchestras were either closed or still assessing their ability to stay open. In general, orchestras feel further away from recovery than other organizations. Orchestras were significantly more likely to select “the focus on post-pandemic activities/recovery/assistance” as a barrier to receiving funding (10% of orchestras vs. 2% of organizations as a whole). Paradoxically, orchestras are more likely to feel optimistic about their ability to recover from the pandemic (74%) than arts organizations as a whole (67%).

5- Huge career losses for individuals

Since the pandemic, 83% of artists and arts workers in the orchestral sector have lost at least some work, with 13% no longer working in the sector at all. On average, respondents have been working in the arts for 23 years. At least 71% of individuals reported a lower expected income than what they were originally projecting. The proportion of individuals who estimate an income of under $20,000 (35%) tripled compared to pre-COVID (13%). 

In addition, individuals project more non-arts income in the mix, with just 68% of these artists and arts workers’ income coming from the arts today vs 80% pre-COVID. About one-third of individuals said it would be unlikely they would be working in the arts and culture in three months’ time (February 2021).

6-Increased stress and anxiety

About four times as many individuals report very high or high levels of stress and anxiety today as compared to before COVID-19. Even more telling is that no respondents reported very high levels pre-COVID-19, compared to 33% today. Women are more likely than men to report high levels of stress and anxiety today than pre-COVID, while the difference pre-COVID was minimal.

7- Orchestras Canada members more connected

Organizations affiliated with Orchestras Canada (60%) tend to be more likely than all participating arts organizations (48%) to stay informed by way of national peer meetings. In addition, about two-thirds (64%) of respondents affiliated with Orchestras Canada report feeling informed about sector and government updates, which is higher than 49% reported by all participating individuals. Yay OC community!

Source: National Arts and Culture Impact Survey, January 2021

Are Canadians ready to return to the arts?

On Tuesday, Sept 22, Chief Data Scientist and Founder of Nanos Research, Nik Nanos shared findings of the latest Arts Response Tracking Survey (ARTS), a partnership between Business / Arts, the National Arts Centre and Nanos Research, which polled over 1,000 Canadians to gauge their attitudes on returning to and supporting the arts across Canada. The fieldwork for this study was completed on July 30th, 2020 and targeted Canadian arts-goers. 

These latest findings offer terrific insight for arts organizations, in particular, fundraisers to help inform programming and fundraising models.

ARTS focused on three axes: 

1- Timing of Return, which tracked the impact of the pandemic and when arts-goers plan to return.

2- Conditions for Return, which tracked what precaution Canadian arts-goers would like to see in place prior to returning to arts and cultural events

3- Donations, which captured reported donation activity for 2019, 2020 and projected to 2021 to understand the likely immediate impact of the pandemic and to plan for 2021. 

Key findings:

 

• Timing of return: 

For indoor cultural activities, 23% of Canadian arts-goers would go back immediately, while 38% said they’d wait 6 months on average before going back. 1 in 3 still unsure about going back.

As for outdoor cultural activities, 37% said they’d go back immediately, 30% would wait 5 months on average, and 1 in 3 are still unsure about going back. 

Museums and galleries are the venues which Canadian arts-goers are not certain about the most, with a whopping 43% who said they’re unsure about when they’d go back. 

 

• Conditions for Return:

Culture-goers increasingly say that masks are a precaution that would make them feel comfortable to attend in-person. This suggests an alignment with public health recommendations. 

For indoor performances, 40% of indoor culture-goers (compared to 27% in May) who plan to attend immediately after reopening want masks. 

As for those who plan to wait 1 to 5 months before returning to attending performances, 43% expressed that they want masks (compared to 29% in May). 

The numbers are very similar for Outdoor performances: the consensus is that people would feel much safer if precautions included masks. 

 

• Donations:

In 2019, 43% of culture-goers donated to arts/cultural organizations an average of $158. In 2020, it is anticipated that the numbers will go down: 39% of culture-goers except to donate an average of $126 , which is a drop of 20% compared to 2019. 

On the bright side, 2021 seems to be promising: 42% intend to donate an average of $222, which is a 40% increase compared to the current year. 

Nik Nanos highlighted the fact that arts organizations will be hit hard this year. However, depending on the economical environment, there will likely be a rebound in donations in 2021. 

It is worth noting that the 35-54 age segment plan to donate less in 2021. This, however, will be compensated by a growth in donation amounts by the 55 plus cohort: their generosity is expected to continue into 2021. 

 

There was a discussion after the presentation by five panelists:

1-  Wesley J. Colford from Highlanders Theatre shared an inspiring success story; This relatively young theatre company, based in Sydney, Nova Scotia, was expecting to go bankrupt by August 2020 due to the pandemic. Instead of giving up, they started a program called “Radical Access”, where they pivoted from selling tickets to a crowdsourcing model by requesting monthly donations. The model has been a great success and they are already at 98% of their funding goal.

2- Irfan Rawji from Glenbow Museum in Calgary discussed finances, and what the Canadian government could do to help arts organizations. He highlighted the example of a UK government program that covers 50% of restaurant-goers’ bills on Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesdays. In essence, the government is allowing the public to pick which restaurants will survive. 

3- Monica Esteves, ED of Canadian Stage in Toronto, said that they surveyed their audiences in June, and learned that their audiences were concerned about the company and its survival. At the same time, audiences were not willing to make long term commitments. In response, Canadian Stage is programming and selling their activities in three month “mini-seasons” and will continue to do so for the next 12 months at least. The board of directors reviews progress and approves plans in three month increments, enabling rapid organizational response to emerging situations.   

4- Claire Sakaki, ED of Bard on the Beach (Vancouver), spoke about their 31 year old Festival, which typically presents 300 performances in an iconic Vancouver location in the summer months. Ticket sales and donations make up the largest proportion of their $9 million annual revenues. Transcending physical location, they quickly re-branded to “Bard Beyond the Beach” with a temporary logo, and started “Bard in your Heart”, a brand for donors. At the same time, they re-imagined all of their activities on virtual platforms, ranging from (performances – you didn’t say?) through backstage tours and an annual dinner.

5- Jayne Watson, CEO of the National Arts Centre Foundation, talked about the NAC’s efforts to keep donors connected and happy at a time of great uncertainty.  She noted the strong connection between appealing projects and donor generosity, highlighting such initiatives as the NAC funding 12 theatre companies to deliver socially distanced performances, and the continued success of the Canada Performs series of free, live-streamed performances. She also noted their pivot from their traditional fall gala to an emphasis on individual donations, including a donation matching program. 

Slides from the meeting 

Video of the meeting

 

Helpful Resources to Learn About Racial Inequity in the Arts and Non-Profit Sector

In late May, the deaths of George Floyd in the United States and Regis Korchinski-Paquet in Canada, each at the hands of the police, provoked an international movement condemning anti-Black racism and police brutality. In the months since, Canadian police have also killed Chantel Moore, Rodney Levi, and Ejaz Choudry, reinforcing the calls for action to address police violence against BIPOC communities in Canada.

There is now a greater sense of urgency in this country in the fight against systemic racism. These issues extend beyond just law enforcement; white supremacy and systemic inequities are prevalent in all industries, including the arts and orchestras. Many people have taken to writing about the arts and non-profit sectors to explain these inequities and provide insights to what long-term change could look like.

Reading list compiled by Nina Jeftic, Equity Coordinator, Orchestras Canada (summer 2020)

We Must Breathe – Why it is important to talk about race and racism in the context of classical music by Lukas Krohn-Grimberghe (WQXR), June 2020

In the article “We Must Breathe – Why it is important to talk about race and racism in the context of classical music”, Lukas Krohn-Grimberghe dives into why classical music, an art form often considered to be universal and meant for everyone, benefits from white privilege and is inaccessible to many. While classical music remains overwhelmingly white, Krohn-Grimberghe highlights why conversations about race in the context of classical music are relevant to the ongoing conversations of systemic racism within society.

Time to finally deal with racism and discrimination in Canadian charities, Shanaaz Gokool (Toronto Star), July 2020

Shanaaz Gokool delves into the world of Canadian charities and not-for profits to discuss the discrepancies that occur between their public mandates and private behaviours. Gokool notes that the pandemic continuously shines a bright light on systemic inequities that appear within these organizations, and calls for the sector to act and make changes that will create long lasting change and put an end to these inequities. She discusses major areas that all not-for profit organizations can improve on, from redefining roles within the organization to implementing new management requirements.

Give Us Permanence—Ending Anti-Black Racism in Canada’s Art Institutions, Syrus Marcus Ware, June 2020

In “Give Us Permanence—Ending Anti-Black Racism in Canada’s Art Institutions”, Syrus Marcus Ware writes about Canadian art institutions needing to go beyond their Black Lives Matter statements and acknowledge the inherent racism and white supremacy that has and continues to exist within them. He discusses the important work of Black artists and curators and presents ways to achieve long lasting structural changes within arts organizations, considering both a shift in power dynamics as well as the works showcased.

A Crisis of Whiteness in Canadian Art Museums, Sean O’Neill, June 2020

In his article, Sean O’Neill surveys the boards and senior executive teams of the four largest public art museums in Canada, finding that they are overwhelmingly white. While most of these organizations make efforts to diversify their exhibition programming, O’Neill calls this “outward -facing progress”, as artists and curators are not in charge of making decisions that are be instrumental to seeing systemic change within arts institutions. His article explains why this overwhelmingly white leadership needs to change in order for public art museums to effectively hold themselves accountable and serve their communities.

An Open Letter to Arts Organizations Rampant with White Supremacy, Nana Chinara, May 2020

“An Open Letter to Arts Organizations Rampant with White Supremacy” is a personal account of Black queer femme artist Nana Chinara, who details her recent experiences working in the arts. Chinara discusses an ongoing grant process in which she was mistreated and the lack of accountability from her employers, even after challenging them to take responsibility. Her article highlights that these mistreatments were all choices made by her employers and discusses the numerous ways in which white supremacy affects Black artists in the industry. She provides several suggestions to organizations to uproot the white supremacy ingrained in them.

A Collective Awokening in the Performing Arts, Michael Zarathus-Cook, June 2020

Michael Zarathus-Cook writes about the performing arts world and explains that the idea of diversity alone does not create a safe space for BIPOC artists, the industry needs to begin to foster a culture of inclusivity. He discusses the need for inclusivity in every aspect of the organization in order to create these spaces, not just in works programmed and performers featured, and that inclusivity extends beyond race. Hosted by Against the Grain Theatre, Zarathus-Cook led two panels as a follow-up to his article featuring BIPOC, LGBTQ2S+, and disabled artists where they discuss the need for equity in the performing arts and what changes can be implemented.

A Collective Awokening in the Performing Arts Panel part 1

A Collective Awokening in the Performing Arts Panel part 2

8 Ways People of Color are Tokenized in Nonprofits, Helen Kim Ho, September 2017

In efforts to diversify or be more inclusive, many organizations may try to recruit or highlight their BIPOC staff/work, which often leads to them being tokenized. In her article, Helen Kim Ho discusses why these organizations, who are dedicated to the common good, so frequently have adverse outcomes to their diversity and inclusion initiatives. She reviews 8 ways that people of colour are tokenized within non-profit groups and why each of these is harmful to those individuals affected.

Open Letter to Directors, Executive Directors, and CEOs of Canadian Charities and Non-Profits, Senator Ratna Omidvar, June 2020

In this open letter, Senator Ratna Omidvar reveals that a majority of non-profits in Canada do not collect data on the diversity of their employees and leaders. Collecting this information annually would be a way to hold these organizations accountable as well as see if and how progress is being made. Senator Omidvar claims that when it comes to diversity, “the sector’s spirit is willing, but it’s flesh is weak”, and calls for the non-profit sector to be leaders in the battle against racism through this crisis

Nonprofits and Foundations Are Unintentionally Promoting Racism: Here’s How to Stop, Michele Norris and Sean Gibbons, February 2019

Michele Norris and Sean Gibbons confront the issues of racism in non-profits head on and discuss how these issues are intertwined with the environment we live in (while their focus is on America, these claims ring true in Canada as well). They write about the influence of the sector and why they cause unintended harm. The article goes through an example of this and discusses the steps taken to reduce it. Norris and Gibbons call for honest introspection within the non-profit world as part of the necessary practices that need to be built to combat racism.

Dear White Orchestras, Alexander Laing (Arts Journal), January 2017

When discussing the lack of Black and Brown people orchestras, Alexander Laing claims that the majority of discussions center around a universalist ethic, where it’s assumed that orchestral music is a universal artform. In his articles, he challenges readers and those part of the classical music/orchestral world to move towards a particularist ethic when discussing issues of race, a definition he borrows from author Jennifer Harvey which “recognizes that there is no one shared standard against we might measure or interpret our experiences of race, nor one to which we may all be held similarly accountable.”

Notes on Racism, and White Supremacy In Classical Music, Brandon Keith Brown, May 2020

Conductor Brandon Keith Brown comments on how racism and white supremacy have personally impacted him and his career in “Notes on Racism, and White Supremacy in Classical Music”. He calls for white people to start doing anti-racist work within themselves. Brown believes that classical music belongs to everyone, and states that a “visceral commitment to include Black artists, audience, artist managers and administrators in their business plan” will be essential to the long-term survival of any orchestra.

Can the arts world fight systemic racism in a real way instead of resorting to tokenism?, Zainub Verjee, June 2020

Zainub Verjee provides an overview of the Canadian arts world, citing several examples from across the country of various artistic responses to social movements. She points out that these struggles are “wiped out of the public memory”, and that the motivations behind diversity are business related. Verjee questions whether the current climate will be enough to begin a commitment to fighting systemic racism on an ongoing basis, or if this crisis will join the others as tokenistic responses.

I’m tired., Andrew Adridge, July 2020

Andrew Adridge, a Toronto-based Guyanese-Canadian baritone writes a vulnerable work sharing his perspective as a Black performer in the classical music industry. He asks members of this community to start to speak out and advocate for Black and Indigenous people. While Canada has a multicultural population, Adridge notes that nothing else has been done by us as a country to prove we are a multicultural country.

REMOTE | Andrew Adridge ‘The Way The Industry Is Currently Structured, I Have No Business Hoping To Be In It’, Michael Zatharus-Cook, June 2020

Michael Zarathus-Cook sits down with baritone Andrew Adridge to discuss the current #BlackLivesMatter movement and changes that need to happen in the performing arts community. Adridge states that the lack on accountability being taken in Canada leads to what he calls “Performance Representation”. He envisions “Authentic Representation”, where “an underrepresented person can actualize a path to belonging”. Adridge explains that the classical music industry plays a role in the #BlackLivesMatter movement, which is a problem beyond just law enforcement.

Art is integral to Black Lives Matter: a conversation with Dr. Kristin Moriah, Nathan Gallagher, June 2020

Nathan Gallagher speaks with English professor Dr. Kristin Moriah to discuss the role of art as a catalyst for social change. Focusing on Black Lives Matter- Toronto, Moriah notes that several of their founding members are arts practitioners and that one of their first actions to attract attention was a piece of performance art- when they temporarily stopped Justin Trudeau’s float at the Toronto Pride Parade. She comments that art and literature provide a different element of understanding to people, and that engaging with Black art can help deepen the insights of those who don’t comprehend the Black experience.

Why we need Black and Indigenous leadership at Canada’s top museums now more than ever, Syrus Marcus Ware and Sean O’Neill, June 2020

Syrus Marcus Ware and Sean O’Neill call for urgent change within management in arts organizations. After the recent #BlackOutTuesday campaign, several people have spoken out about the racism they experienced at these organizations. Both Ware and O’Neill advocate for structural change within these organizations to begin to combat the racism imbedded within them. Ware notes that it is only in the moments of unrest that museums choose to engage with Black artists, and thinks that including Black and Indigenous voices in management as well as regularly programmed artists will increase the excellency of the work featured.

A Statement on Racial Inequity from Orchestras Canada

While Orchestras Canada serves a national network of Canadian orchestras, our office is on the treaty and traditional territory of the Michi Saagiig Anishinaabeg. We offer gratitude to the First Peoples for their care for, and teachings about, our earth and our relations. We will honour those teachings.

We are grieved by the anti-Black racist events in recent weeks.

We acknowledge that our society is built on, yet critically weakened by, systemic racism.

Orchestras Canada is committed to a more just society for all.

We are committed to sustained and effective action, manifested through our internal practices and our service to orchestras and the music that is shared.

With much to learn, we approach this important work with humility and transparency, guided by colleagues with lived experience. Their guidance is truly a generous gift.

We call on Canadian orchestras to recruit Black people, Indigenous people, and People of Colour in decision-making roles, as board members, lead volunteers, arts workers, and arts leaders.

We call on Canadian orchestras to welcome Black artists, Indigenous artists, and artists of colour to their stages, as conductors, performers, soloists, composers, mentors, and creators.

Until Canadian orchestras are fully welcoming and accessible, Orchestras Canada will encourage orchestras to adopt external strategies and internal practices that will foster an inclusive network of diverse leaders, artists, arts workers, volunteers, and audiences.

At our national conference in 2016, members asked OC to take the lead on commissioning and curating resources to inform Canadian orchestras’ work in inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility. Since then, this work has been a focus for us, and has informed our research, knowledge-sharing, and convening practices, along with our nominating and recruitment efforts. The following is a short list of the resources that we’ve developed; more can be found here.

OC Resources

Other resources that we have found helpful

Briefing to the Standing Committee on Finance

May 8th, 2020

Orchestras Canada/Orchestres Canada (OC) is the national association for Canadian orchestras, representing over 130 groups from coast to coast, ranging from volunteer-driven community ensembles to youth and training orchestras to nationally and internationally-renowned groups. Our mandate includes advocacy, convening, research and knowledge-sharing, and we work in close collaboration with the Canadian Arts Coalition, Canada’s Performing Arts Alliance, and Imagine Canada.

We are pleased to share orchestras’ perspectives on the Government of Canada’s responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, and hope they are helpful in the Committee’s work.

Context

Canadian orchestras are not-for-profit organizations and registered charities. In 2018-19, according to OC’s comparative data from 71 of our largest member orchestras, orchestras derived 35.8% of their revenues from ticket sales and sold services, and 40.2% from individuals, corporations, foundations, and special fundraising events. Government support (from all three orders of government) made up the difference. Our members reported revenues of almost $218 million and connected with 2.8 million Canadians.

Canadian orchestras are structured in different ways, depending on mission, mandate, and community context. They range from volunteer groups with a paid music director and a hands-on board of directors to fully-professional ensembles with collective bargaining agreements with tenured musicians, a professional staff, and a high-powered governance board – and all points in between. Depending on the size of the orchestra, anywhere from one to well over 200 people are paid to do work directly for and with the orchestra each season, and they are all vulnerable to changes in their orchestra’s financial health. Orchestras also tend to plan and market their concerts 18-24 months in advance.

With public gatherings effectively banned in mid-March, our orchestras moved to cancel already-scheduled (and in some cases, sold-out) concerts; as the pandemic has continued, orchestras (which typically perform a September-June season, with some groups also programming in the summer months) have cancelled both spring and summer programs. Refunds or credits for ticket purchases have been processed; and many loyal patrons have converted the value of their tickets to charitable donations. We are tracking the impact of the pandemic on contributed income, and will have more to report as orchestras complete their fiscal years.

Still, we emphasize that some 76% of orchestras’ revenues are vulnerable at this time, their potential loss is highly destabilizing, and – as Canadian Heritage minister Steven Guilbeault said to Montreal’s Chamber of Commerce last week, “« Il est difficile de voir un retour à la normale avant le début de l’année prochaine, et c’est peut-être ça aussi, un scénario optimiste ». Indeed, every published provincial guidelines place concerts and other large public events in the final stages of their proposed reopening plans.

Orchestras are now looking at alternate scenarios for fall 2020 and beyond, including the cancellation or postponement of concerts, the implementation of physical distancing measures for artists, audience members, and venue workers, and re-programming already-planned concerts to feature smaller ensembles, physically-distanced audiences, and different venues. The logistical, financial and legal challenges that these scenarios imply are daunting: the increased costs of implementing recommended health and safety measures combined with significantly reduced ticket revenues are simply incompatible. At the same time, we emphasize that orchestras will not put the health of audiences, artists or workers at risk.

Observations on Supports from the Government of Canada

First of all, orchestras are profoundly grateful for the speed at which the Government of Canada has moved to implement economic supports across the broader economy: speed that has been matched with a high level of responsiveness to emerging needs and issues. The pace at which such programs as the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy, Canada Emergency Response Benefit and the Canada Emergency Bank Account have been successfully introduced and adapted to meet diverse needs across the economy has been nothing short of remarkable. We also note the Canada Council for the Arts’ decision to expedite the release of 35% of core grants to organizations payable in the 2020-21 fiscal year; while this will not have an impact on year-end results, it will assist some 37 Canadian orchestras to manage cash flow at a tremendously challenging time. Thank you.

Secondly, we eagerly await details on the $500 million investment in arts, culture and sports, first announced by Prime Minister Trudeau on April 17. We hope that some portion of it can be directed to meet needs not yet addressed in the cross-economy measures already in effect.

Specific gaps during the emergency relief period include the following:

  • The CEWS only applies to employees, and not to long-time independent contractors. This leaves a number of orchestras in a difficult situation: they are continuing to compensate their contracted musicians (whom they treat as independent contractors) to create and work from home, but are not yet eligible for any form of subsidy to assist with this cost. This could be addressed by expanding the program to incorporate more classes of workers.
  • We also note that CEWS is due to end June 6: well before orchestras are likely to see any stability in their earned or contributed revenues, since many may still be closed until early 2021 or later.
  • The CEBA is available only to groups with payroll between $20,000 and $1.5 million per year. Larger groups, with greater cash flow assistance needs, are ineligible for consideration for interest-free loans by BDC and EDC because they are organized as registered charities. This could be addressed by expanding the CEBA to cover more employers, or potentially removing the exclusion of organizations that further a charitable purpose under the Canada Small Business Financing Act, to enable banks to assist larger organizations in our sector and to provide additional support for mid-sized orchestras who need more than the $40,000 that CEBA offers.
  • Smaller arts organizations and grassroots community groups have, to some extent, fallen between the cracks of the targeted government assistance to date, yet play a key role in their communities and are profoundly affected by the crisis. We join with Imagine Canada in the call for a non-profit and charitable sector stabilization fund to help them continue to function through this time.
  • Many cultural and community-based organizations own and manage their own buildings, edifices that need to be heated, lit, secured, and maintained even when closed and not generating revenue. They are under unique pressure at this time. Again, we are pleased to support Imagine Canada’s call for a sector stabilization program that would help address the needs of valued community-based groups that own and manage community infrastructure.
  • We’d also emphasize the desirability of providing broad-based incentives for charitable giving and business sponsorship at this time. We support a temporary increase in non-refundable tax credits for charitable giving, believing that this will be the most helpful to the greatest number of groups, and would be relatively easy to administer.

At another point in the Standing Committee’s process, we would be pleased to share perspectives on the re-building, re-imagining and re-launching phases ahead. Although the timeline for lifting restrictions is currently and inevitably far from certain, it is likely that the live performing arts will be at the far end of that process. Identifying and addressing the interim needs for support for our sector will be fundamental to achieving a robust and comprehensive return to core activities.

In both good and challenging times, our member orchestras serve and connect with audiences in every Canadian province. The Government of Canada has been an important partner in this work over many years, and we look forward to continued work together. Thank you for your consideration.

Katherine Carleton, C.M.
Executive Director
Orchestras Canada/Orchestres Canada